Under Banner Decoration

View Recent Blog Posts in Admiralty and Maritime

  • Offshore Marine Service Association’s (OMSA) Guidance on Personnel Transport During the COVID-19 Pandemic By: Chuck Talley and Gabe Silva On March 25, 2020, the Offshore Marine Service Association (OMSA) issued a memorandum providing guidance on the transport of potentially infected personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. The memorandum aims to guide the offshore service industry on using the appropriate standards and procedures prior to, during and after the transport... Continue Reading... ....
  • Jones Act Vessel Status Update: The Louisiana Supreme Court Finds Riverboat Casino is not a Vessel in Navigation By Stephen C. Hanemann Although the riverboat casino Grand Palais was originally designed to transport people over water, and did so until 2001, and is theoretically capable of navigation, the Louisiana Supreme Court has determined that it is no longer a vessel in navigation. Don Caldwell v. St. Charles Gaming Co., 2019-1238 (La. 1/29/20),           ... Continue Reading... ....
  • Update: Supreme Court Rejects Punitive Damages for Unseaworthiness Claims By Tod J. Everage Today, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a Circuit Split, holding that punitive damages are not recoverable to a seaman under an unseaworthiness claim. The Court, in a 6-3 ruling, sided with the U.S. Fifth Circuit’s analysis under McBride and reversed the U.S. Ninth Circuit’s decision in Dutra v. Batterton. The Court... Continue Reading... ....
  • Duty to Provide Appropriate Medical Care – An Unexpected Source of Liability for Jones Act Employers By Daniel Stanton Among the various duties that Jones Act employers are charged with is the duty to provide its seamen with reasonable medical care.  In a recent decision from the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Randle v. Crosby Tugs, L.L.C., the Court considered the extent of this duty and how it may be... Continue Reading... ....
  • Jones Act Employer on Hook For Unnecessary Maintenance and Cure Payments By Blake Crohan In In the Matter of 4-K Marine, No. 18-30348 (5th Cir. Jan. 30, 2019) the U.S. Fifth Circuit held that the owner of a stationary, “innocent” vessel is not entitled to reimbursement of the medical expenses of an employee who fraudulently claimed his preexisting injuries resulted from an allision. In June 2015,... Continue Reading... ....
  • U.S. Supreme Court Holds Transportation Workers Exempt from Arbitration By: R. Chauvin Kean Generally, a contract is the law between parties, which has long been the position of the U.S. Supreme Court. However, as most well know, this principle is not without limitation. On January 15, 2019, in New Prime v. Oliveira, the Court unanimously held that disputes concerning contracts of employment involving transportation... Continue Reading... ....
  • UPDATE: Supreme Court grants writs in Dutra v. Batterton By: Tod J. Everage Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the Writ of Certiorari in the Dutra v. Batterton case, setting the stage for a resolution of the Circuit Split between the US Fifth and Ninth Circuits on whether punitive damages are available to a seaman on an unseaworthiness claim. A more thorough review... Continue Reading... ....
  • U.S. 5th Circuit Defines “Operating” Under OPA By Amanda Howard Lowe In a decision of first impression interpreting the meaning of “operating” under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA,” 33 U.S.C. §§2701 et seq.), the U.S. Fifth Circuit held the owner and operator of a tugboat liable as the “responsible party” for a spill emanating from a tank barge in its... Continue Reading... ....
  • Be Careful How You Word Your Contracts and Complaints: 5th Circuit Silences “Prevailing Party” Fee Provision in JOA Dispute By Tod J. Everage The modern day contract is a direct result of trial and error. Generally speaking, transactional lawyers try to negotiate “bulletproof” contracts providing exactly what their client wants or needs. Despite their best efforts, litigators in later disputes try their level best to find the “errors” in those contracts that could benefit... Continue Reading... ....
  • Understanding Similarities and Differences in Four Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Acts By Zoe Vermeulen Indemnity provisions are widely used in the energy industry as a method of contractually apportioning liability between parties.  These provisions are a staple in Master Service Agreements and can be unilateral or mutual.  Often, agreements contain knock-for-knock provisions where each party assumes responsibility for claims made by its own employees or subcontractors. ... Continue Reading... ....